Quantcast The Sophian
College Media Network

Current Issue:

Throwing money at automobile industry not the solution

Johanna Johnson

Issue date: 12/4/08 Section: Opinions
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1
The automotive industry - choking to death on its own exhaust - recently begged Washington for funds in an attempt to avoid bankruptcy. Like the rest of the economy, the "Big Three" manufacturers of the auto industry - General Motors, Ford Motor and Chrysler - have suffered recently. General Motors alone has lost more than $18 billion this year, and the industry overall has fallen 14.6 percent. The automakers asked for a portion of the $700 billion rescue package - even though it is not meant as an economic stimulus - specifically $25 billion in cash ads and $25 billion more in loan guarantees. Congress, reluctant to simply hand out $50 billion of taxpayers' money without any guarantee of improvement, gave the automakers two weeks to design a plan for rebuilding their companies.

There are many good reasons why automakers should get the money. Without an immediate bailout from Congress, it is possible that General Motors could go bankrupt by the end of the year. This scenario could lead to their parts suppliers suffering and even shutting down. Because much of the automotive industry is connected, suppliers' failures would affect Ford and Chrysler as well in a domino effect damaging the whole industry and leading to job loss on an even greater scale.

But calm down, Chicken Little; the sky might not be falling after all. The automotive industry has been limping along for years. Held back by uncompetitive designs and saddled with wasteful executive spending, it is no wonder the giants are not what they used to be. Since 2006 alone, 100,000 jobs have been cut from the once-booming industry. As Mitt Romney suggested in an Op-Ed piece to the New York Times, the automaker's financial crisis might be just the incentive they need to finally restructure themselves into profitable, innovative companies again. Their current problems are their own fault, created by longstanding mismanagement, not the global economic collapse. Propped up by a bailout, they will simply keep slumping along until a new problem finally brings them down.

Throwing money at the auto industry will not fix it. Congress's request for a plan before making a final decision on the bailout is better than nothing; at least it shows some regard for taxpayers' money. But how likely is it that the automakers will design a plan that voluntarily provides the radical changes needed for the industry? Government coddling will never force the automakers to reorganize themselves; only the need to survive in a competitive economy will.
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 6 of 6

Steve Gregg

posted 12/04/08 @ 1:30 PM EST

The US automotive industry is not in trouble nor in danger of going bankrupt. Just the Big Three dinosaurs in the northern rust belt are in danger of becoming extinct. (Continued…)

mntmn3

Wesley S.

posted 12/04/08 @ 2:27 PM EST

The auto industry should not be bailed out. If the Big Three file bankruptcy, they will not just disappear and leave all those suppliers in the lurch. (Continued…)

John Smith

posted 12/05/08 @ 2:41 AM EST

NO BAILOUT!!! These companies have BAD management. Mulally spent $760,000 on "personal" (not business) corporate jet use. He has total compensation of $22 million. (Continued…)

Jane D.

posted 12/08/08 @ 2:37 PM EST

Currently, Ford Motor Company employs about 300,000, General Motors employs about 335,000, and Chrysler Motor Company employs about 66,000. Should these companies reach bankruptcy, there is no doubt they would have to slash jobs. (Continued…)

Tired

posted 12/08/08 @ 7:01 PM EST

It is no wonder that middle-class, hippie, "I love everyone but America" Smithies would be against a bailout. Why don't we give all of America's resources to China and Japan instead? Then maybe when we are eating our toenails to stay alive, we will accept 15 cents to build crap. (Continued…)

Wesley S.

posted 12/08/08 @ 7:42 PM EST

They are billions in debt because they aren't paying back the loans they have now. What sane mind would lend them more money? Won't they skim a little of this to pay for more lobbying for more money? We know how efficient (LMFAO)) the federal government is with money, so that would be child's play. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.