Smithies weigh in on Obama's Nobel Prize
Faizaa Fatima
Issue date: 10/29/09 Section: Opinions
October 2009 opened the door to a grandiose victory of the Obama regime in the U.S. The nation's president, Barack Obama, was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize "for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples" and his "vision of and work for a world without nuclear weapons," according to the Norwegian Nobel Committee.
Undoubtedly, it is a rare honor for President Obama that "elicited praise and puzzlement across the globe," as most of the newspaper reviews state. And, according to the New York Times, the award is "perhaps more burden than glory ... for Mr. Obama." Worldwide reactions have been widely publicized, from Talibans, Hezbollah, Democrats and Republicans alike; but it's time to hear what the Smith community has to say on this matter.
Unlike many other colleges, Smith does not have a history of unduly resisting freedom of speech and expression on campus. Therefore, it was easier for students to take their own political stances and voice their concerns.
Tasnim Islam '12, who is taking a government course this semester, said, "I'm very happy for President Obama. However, I would consider the prize-giving a hasty action since the president has just started his tenure and extended his ideas over the past nine months. Any real implementation is yet to take place. I think the prize-giving could have been delayed a bit further."
Even for registered Democrats like Libby Donovan '13, who voted for Obama last November, the news came as a shock. "I seriously thought it was a joke when my brother told me about it," she said. "By that I don't mean he doesn't deserve to win the prize eventually, but it could have been awarded after his first year as president or later on. "
Some like Iju Shakya '13 didn't take any political stance. "All these happened within a very short time and the president hasn't had the chance to do anything to bring peace to the world," she said. "But his speeches focus a lot a globalization. So, that might have been one of the reasons he actually was awarded the prize."
Undoubtedly, it is a rare honor for President Obama that "elicited praise and puzzlement across the globe," as most of the newspaper reviews state. And, according to the New York Times, the award is "perhaps more burden than glory ... for Mr. Obama." Worldwide reactions have been widely publicized, from Talibans, Hezbollah, Democrats and Republicans alike; but it's time to hear what the Smith community has to say on this matter.
Unlike many other colleges, Smith does not have a history of unduly resisting freedom of speech and expression on campus. Therefore, it was easier for students to take their own political stances and voice their concerns.
Tasnim Islam '12, who is taking a government course this semester, said, "I'm very happy for President Obama. However, I would consider the prize-giving a hasty action since the president has just started his tenure and extended his ideas over the past nine months. Any real implementation is yet to take place. I think the prize-giving could have been delayed a bit further."
Even for registered Democrats like Libby Donovan '13, who voted for Obama last November, the news came as a shock. "I seriously thought it was a joke when my brother told me about it," she said. "By that I don't mean he doesn't deserve to win the prize eventually, but it could have been awarded after his first year as president or later on. "
Some like Iju Shakya '13 didn't take any political stance. "All these happened within a very short time and the president hasn't had the chance to do anything to bring peace to the world," she said. "But his speeches focus a lot a globalization. So, that might have been one of the reasons he actually was awarded the prize."
Be the first to comment on this story